Assessment of Seismic Collapse Capacity in Special Moment-Resisting Frames Designed via Equivalent Lateral Force and Response Spectrum Procedures Under ASCE 7-22 and FEMA P-695 Frameworks | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering | ||
| دوره 1، شماره 4، دی 2025، صفحه 428-445 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/ijce.2025.107012 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Parsa Rashvand؛ Mohammad Javad Hamidia* ؛ Nemat Hassani | ||
| Faculty of Civil, Water, and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Steel special moment-resisting frame (SMRFs) are considered one of the most widely used seismic force-resisting systems in earthquake-prone regions, designed to provide high ductility and energy dissipation capacity. In this study, the effect of the initial structural design method on the collapse capacity of this system was investigated. For this purpose, three structures with 2, 4, and 8 stories were designed in accordance with the provisions of ASCE 7-22 using both the equivalent lateral force (ELF) method and the response spectrum analysis (RSA) method in ETABS software, and the required member sections were obtained. Subsequently, the developed models were transferred to the OpenSees platform and subjected to modal analysis, nonlinear static analysis, and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). For the Incremental Dynamic Analysis, 44 far-field earthquake ground motion records recommended in FEMA P695 were employed. In total, more than 9,000 nonlinear time-history analyses were conducted to develop fragility curves and calculate the collapse margin ratio (CMR). The obtained results indicate that the initial analysis and design method has a significant effect on the final nonlinear structural response and the probability of collapse at high seismic intensity levels. In all models, structures designed using the equivalent lateral force method exhibited higher collapse margin ratios compared to those designed using the response spectrum analysis method, indicating greater seismic capacity and higher safety margins against collapse. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Steel Moment-Resisting Frame؛ Collapse Margin Ratio؛ ASCE 7-22 Standard؛ Incremental Dynamic Analysis؛ Fragility Curves؛ FEMA P695 Methodology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adam, C., Ibarra, L. F., & Krawinkler, H. (2004). Evaluation of P-delta effects in non-deteriorating MDOF structures from equivalent SDOF systems. Stanford University.
AISC. (2022a). Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications (ANSI/AISC 358-22). American Institute of Steel Construction.
AISC. (2022b). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-22). American Institute of Steel Construction.
AISC Committee. (2022). Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-22). American Institute of Steel Construction.
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2022). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Author.
Computers and Structures, Inc. (2024). ETABS user’s manual (Version 20.0.0). Author.
Farsangi, E. N., Yang, T. Y., & Tasnimi, A. A. (2016). Influence of concurrent horizontal and vertical ground excitations on the collapse margins of non-ductile RC frame buildings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics: An International Journal, 59(4), 653–669.
FEMA. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P-695). Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA. (2018). Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1 – Methodology (FEMA P-58-1). Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Hall, J. F., Holmes, W. T., & Somers, P. (1995). Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: Reconnaissance report (Vol. 1). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Hamidia, M., Filiatrault, A., & Aref, A. (2014a). Simplified seismic sidesway collapse analysis of frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43(3), 429–448.
Hamidia, M., Filiatrault, A., & Aref, A. (2014b). Simplified seismic sidesway collapse capacity-based evaluation and design of frame buildings with linear viscous dampers. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18(4), 528–552.
Hamidia, M., Filiatrault, A., & Aref, A. (2015). Seismic collapse capacity–based evaluation and design of frame buildings with viscous dampers using pushover analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(6), 04014153.
Hamidia, M., Shokrollahi, N., & Ardakani, R. R. (2022). The collapse margin ratio of steel frames considering the vertical component of earthquake ground motions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 188, 107054.
Hassani, N., & Takada, S. (1995). Lifelines performance and damage during 17 Jan. 1995, South Hyogo Great Earthquake. In Proceedings of the first Iran–Japan Workshop on Recent Earthquakes in Iran and Japan (pp. 1809–1821).
Hassani, N., Takada, S., & Mostafa, A. A. (1995). Quick report of main damage caused by the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nambu earthquake. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 16(3), 59–70.
Hauksson, E., Jones, L. M., & Hutton, K. (1995). The 1994 Northridge earthquake sequence in California: Seismological and tectonic aspects. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B7), 12335–12355.
Hojatirad, A., & Naderpour, H. (2021). Seismic assessment of RC structures having shape memory alloys rebar and strengthened using CFRP sheets in terms of fragility curves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(12), 5087–5112.
Hough, S. E., Graves, R. W., Cochran, E. S., Yoon, C. E., Blair, L., Haefner, S., … Quitoriano, V. (2024). The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: A retrospective analysis. The Seismic Record, 4(3), 151–160.
Jennings, P. C. (1971). Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971 (Vol. 71, No. 2). California Institute of Technology, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory.
Koketsu, K. (1996). Damaging earthquakes in California and 1995 Kobe earthquake. Science Journal, 66, 93–97.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, 264(1), 137–158.
McKenna, F. (2011). OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(4), 58–66.
Naderpour, H., Kiani, A., & Kheyroddin, A. (2020). Structural control of RC buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions in terms of tuned mass dampers. Scientia Iranica, 27(1), 122–133.
Popov, E. P., Yang, T. S., & Chang, S. P. (1998). Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake. Engineering Structures, 20(12), 1030–1038.
Shafaei, H., & Naderpour, H. (2022). Collapse capacity of ordinary RC moment frames considering mainshock-aftershock effects. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(10), 5318–5337.
Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491–514. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 20 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 12 |
||