تبیین اثرگذاری مشارکت شهرسازان در تحقق محله آرام (مطالعه موردی: محله باغ فیض منطقه پنج شهر تهران) | ||
| فصلنامه علمی توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 7، شماره 15، دی 1404، صفحه 105-120 اصل مقاله (1.88 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/sdge.2025.236869.1213 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| نگار خوش تراش* | ||
| گروه شهرسازی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: چالشهای توسعه شهری در سطح جهانی به دلیل شهرنشینی سریع و عدم توجه کافی به نیازهای معنوی شهروندان برای ایجاد آرامش کافی پدیدار شده است. این چالشها از طریق کاهش امنیت، افزایش ترافیک، دسترسی ناکافی به خدمات شهری و تشدید نابرابریهای اجتماعی نمایان میشود. فقدان اطلاعات و آگاهی، نبود اعتماد به نهادهای شهری، محدودیت منابع، ساختارهای تصمیمگیری سلسلهمراتبی سنتی، مقاومت در برابر ایدههای نوآورانه، ارتباط ضعیف بین برنامهریزان شهری و سازمانها، فقدان شفافیت و نبود اهداف راهبردی، موانع مهمی برای برنامهریزی شهری مؤثر هستند. این مسائل شکافی بین شهروندان و نهادهای شهری ایجاد میکند که منجر به کاهش احساس تعلق و کاهش تمایل به حفاظت از فضاهای عمومی میشود. جنبش «محله آرام» به عنوان پاسخی برای بهبود کیفیت زندگی در عین کاهش سرعت شهری و اعتراض به فرهنگ فستفود و توسعه سریع پدیدار شد. این مطالعه با هدف تبیین تأثیر مؤلفههای مشارکت برنامهریزان شهری بر دستیابی به محله آرام در محله باغ فیض، منطقه ۵ تهران انجام شده است. مواد و روشها: این پژوهش از روششناسی کاربردی با رویکرد توصیفی-تحلیلی استفاده میکند و از روشهای تحقیق کتابخانهای و میدانی ترکیبی بهره میبرد. یک پرسشنامه جامع برای شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر تحقق شهر آرام طراحی شد که از رویکرد کمی از طریق مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده میکند. چارچوب نظری شامل متغیرهای مستقل (مؤلفههای مشارکت برنامهریزان شهری) و متغیر وابسته (دستیابی به شهر آرام) است. پایایی با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ ارزیابی شد که مقادیر بالای ۰.۷ را نشان داد. بارهای عاملی برای تمام متغیرها از ۰.۴ بیشتر بود که پایایی و روایی سازه را تأیید میکند. جامعه آماری شامل ۲۴۶ کارشناس و مهندس برنامهریزی شهری فعال در محله باغ فیض بود که به دلیل تخصص حرفهای و دانش عمیق آنها از فرآیندهای برنامهریزی شهری انتخاب شدند. با استفاده از فرمول کوکران، ۱۵۴ نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه مناسب محاسبه شد. این مطالعه شامل کارشناسان از رشتههای برنامهریزی شهری، جغرافیا، معماری و مدیریت شهری بود. تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها با استفاده از نرمافزار SmartPLS نسخه ۴ انجام شد. نتایج و بحث: تحلیل مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری تأثیرات قابل توجه متغیرهای مختلف بر مشارکت برنامهریزان شهری و دستیابی به شهر آرام را نشان داد. مشارکت برنامهریزان شهری بیشترین تأثیر را بر کیفیت زندگی شهری نشان داد (۰.۹۱۴ = R²). عوامل کلیدی افزایش مشارکت شامل بهبود امکانات آموزشی، رعایت اصول پایداری و محیطزیست، ایجاد فضاهای عمومی و تفریحی و تعامل با ساکنان بود. تحلیل مؤلفههای حیاتی مانند دسترسی و تحرک، مسئولیت در اقدامات شهری، مشارکت در تصمیمگیری شهری، مدیریت فضای عمومی، مشارکت در طراحی شهری و همکاری با مقامات محلی را به عنوان عوامل مهم شناسایی کرد. نتیجهگیری: این پژوهش نقش حیاتی مشارکت برنامهریزان شهری در دستیابی به توسعه پایدار شهری و ارتقای کیفیت زندگی شهری را نشان میدهد. مشارکت فعال در فرآیندهای برنامهریزی، ابتکارات آموزش شهروندی و ایجاد فضاهای شهری مناسب به طور قابل توجهی کیفیت زندگی را بهبود میبخشد و روابط اجتماعی را در بافتهای شهری قدیمی و جدید محله تقویت میکند. یافتهها نشان میدهد که مشارکت مؤثر برنامهریزان شهری به عنوان کاتالیزوری برای تحقق محله آرام عمل میکند که نیازمند رویکردهای جامع است که تخصص حرفهای، مشارکت جامعه و اصول توسعه پایدار را یکپارچه میکند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| توسعه پایدار شهری؛ محله آرام؛ مشارکت؛ مشارکت برنامهریزان شهری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Explaining Impact of Urban Planners' Participation in Achieving a Slow neighborhood (Case Study: Bagh-e- Feiz Neighborhood, 5th District, Tehran City) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Negar Khoshtarash | ||
| Department of Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Urban development challenges have emerged globally due to rapid urbanization and inadequate attention to citizens’ need for urban tranquility. These challenges manifest through reduced security, traffic congestion, inadequate urban services, and social inequalities. The lack of information and awareness, absence of institutional trust, resource limitations, hierarchical decision-making structures, resistance to innovation, poor communication between planners and organizations, lack of transparency, and absence of strategic goals represent significant barriers to effective urban planning. These issues create gaps between citizens and institutions, leading to diminished belonging and reduced willingness to protect public spaces. The "Tranquil City" movement emerged to improve quality of life while reducing urban pace and protesting fast development patterns. This study examines the impact of urban planner participation components on achieving a tranquil city in Bagh-e-Feyz neighborhood, District 5, Tehran. Materials and Methods: This research adopts an applied research approach with a descriptive-analytical approach and combines literature review and field data collection. A comprehensive questionnaire was designed to identify factors affecting the realization of quiet cities, using a quantitative approach through structural equation modeling. The theoretical framework includes independent variables (components of urban planners' participation) and a dependent variable (achieving a quiet city). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, which showed values above 0.7. Factor loadings for all variables exceeded 0.4, confirming construct reliability and validity. The statistical population consisted of 246 urban planning experts and engineers active in the Bagh-e-Feyz neighborhood, selected due to their professional expertise and deep knowledge of urban planning processes. Using Cochran's formula, 154 individuals were calculated as an appropriate sample size. This study included experts from disciplines including urban planning, geography, architecture, and urban management. Data analysis was performed using SmartPLS software version 4. Results and Discussion: Structural equation modeling analysis revealed significant effects of various variables on urban planners' participation and achieving a quiet city. Urban planners' participation showed the greatest impact on urban quality of life (R² = 0.914). Key factors enhancing participation included improving educational facilities, adhering to sustainability and environmental principles, creating public and recreational spaces, and engaging with residents. The analysis identified critical components such as accessibility and mobility, responsibility in urban actions, participation in urban decision-making, public space management, participation in urban design, and collaboration with local authorities as significant factors. Conclusion: This research demonstrates the critical role of urban planners' participation in achieving sustainable urban development and enhancing urban quality of life. Active participation in planning processes, citizen education initiatives, and creating appropriate urban spaces significantly improve quality of life and strengthen social relations in both old and new urban fabrics. The findings indicate that effective urban planners' participation acts as a catalyst for achieving a tranquil city, requiring comprehensive approaches integrating professional expertise, community engagement, and sustainable development principles. The study provides valuable insights for policymakers and urban planning professionals seeking to implement tranquil city concepts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Sustainable urban development, peaceful city, participation, Urban planner participation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ağbay, N. C. and Kama, S. 2023. Leisure Activity and Place Requirement for a Better Life in Slow City Ahlat. In Managing Tourism Across Continents (MTCON23). İstanbul. https://doi.org/10.5038/9781955833097. Albrecht, A. J. 2015. Digital media façades for lively public spaces: Promoting dialogue, participation, and social innovation in urban environments. In Proceedings of the Making Cities Liveable Conference 2015, 8th Edition. Melbourne, Australia. http://liveablecities.org.au/archives/lc_bop_pr15.pdf. Ananda, A. A. 2022. Factors affecting economic development and job opportunity in Samarinda. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i1.258. Arizapa, D. L. Vivas, D. G. and Camaro, P. J. 2025. Sustainable transportation choices and household budgets: Exploring the effects of travel conditions, alternative access, and infrastructure quality on household transportation expenditures in Hermosa, Bataan, and Malolos, Bulacan. International Journal of Economic Policy, 5(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.2445. Borchers, M. Tavanapour, N. and Bittner, E. 2023. Designing Mobile Applications for Citizen Participation in Urban Planning. Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.054. Boureggah, A. S. Maniruzzaman, K. M. Abubakar, I. R. and Boureggah, M. S. 2023. Investigating the prospect of e-participation in urban planning in Saudi Arabia. Cities, 134(104186), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104186. Brown, A. and Jeong, B. 2018. International comparison and implementation of Slow City success determinants: The case of Damyang Slow City, South Korea, and Seferihisar Slow City, Turkey. Development and Society, 47(4), 613-631. https://doi.org/10.21588/dns/2018.47.4.005. Canan, F. and Varolgüneş, F. K. 2018. A Slow City Movement: The Case of Halfeti in Turkey. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 6(2), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.61. Çevik, S. and Sarıipek, S. 2022. Memorable Tourism Experience in Slow Cities: A Netnographic Analysis in the Case of Halfeti. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Tourism and Regional Development, 14(2), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2022.017. Chen, L. Huang, W. Dong, J. and Wang, B. 2024. Protection of historical and cultural cities: Shaping resident's psychological needs and identity formation. Journal of Cultural and Territorial Economics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.62517/jcte.202406208. Cyburt, A. Holownia, P. and Kuzmicki, M. 2016. Cooperation Between Local Authorities and Non-Governmental Organisations for The Benefit of Local Development. Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), 9(3), June. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.250239 Davies, J. and Donnelly, M. 2023. Spatial division of opportunity: local economic context, elite trajectories, and the widening participation industry. Social & Cultural Geography, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2023.2203119. Deverteuil, G. 2022. Slow scholarship, the slow city, and counter-visual practices. Environment and Planning F, 1(2), 263498252211238. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825221123862. Echendu, A. 2023. Urban planners’ perspectives of public participation in planning in Nigeria. SN Social Sciences, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00604-4. Esmaeili, K. Khatibi, M. and Pourjafar, M. 2019. Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Realization of the Calm City Approach; Case Study: Mehrshahr, Karaj. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(3), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2019.13341.1202. (In Persian) Fan, P. Ren, L. and Zeng, X. 2024. Resident participation in environmental governance of sustainable tourism in rural destinations. Sustainability, 16(18), 8173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188173. Fan, Q. Li, G. Jiang, X. Ma, B. Chen, T. and Li, M. 2024. Intelligent control method and system for vibroflotation construction in hydropower engineering. Journal of Intelligent Construction, 2(3), 9180020. https://doi.org/10.26599/JIC.2024.9180020. Farelnik, E. 2020. Determinants of the development of slow cities in Poland. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64(7), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2020.7.02. Foroughi, M. Andrade, B. Roders, A. P. and Wang, T. 2023. Public participation and consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning: A systematic literature review. Cities, 135(10), 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104235. Forouhar, N. and Forouhar, A. 2020. Evaluating the Role of Urban Planners in Participatory Urban Planning: A Conceptual Model of Success in Iran. Arch Bus Adm. (In Persian) Fu, W. Ran, C. Huang, J. Chen, Z. and [Additional Authors], 2023. Can acoustic indices reflect the characteristics of public recreational behavior in urban green spaces? Ecological Indicators, 154(2), 110729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110729 Gaikwad, R. R. and Sathe, C. 2024. Environment and sustainability pillar. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(09), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(09).33 Gutiérrez-Sanín, F. and Vargas Reina, J. 2017. Agrarian elite participation in Colombia's civil war. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(4), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12235 Henderson, J. V. and Turner, M. A. 2020. Urbanization in the Developing World: Too Early or Too Slow? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.150 Husin, A. Helmi, H. Nengsih, Y. K. and Rendana, M. 2025. Environmental education in schools: Sustainability and hope. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00837-2 Iversen, L. L. 2018. From safe spaces to communities of disagreement. British Journal of Religious Education, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1445617 Karavaeva, T. 2024. Urban development: A synergistic approach and interregional cooperation. Regionalnaya ekonomika Yug Rossii. https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2024.1.4 Khaliji, M. A. and Jafarpour Ghalehteimouri, K. 2024. Empowering urban spaces: A functional evaluation of women's participation through participatory planning – A case study of Tehran’s 20th district. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14456/jris.2024.3 (In Persian) Kreusslein, M. and Günther, M. 2024. Power to the citizens: Factors fostering satisfaction with citizen participation in urban planning. Presented at the 15th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2024). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005342 Kuleva, I. Koleva, V. P. Dragoeva, A. and [Additional Authors], 2024. A healthy lifestyle score and healthy behaviour of adults in Bulgaria. Acta Scientifica Naturalis, 11(3), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/asn-2024-0016 Li, H. 2023. Public Participation in China Urban Planning Development. SHS Web of Conferences, 178. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317803004. Liao, L. Zhang, C. and Feng, J. 2019. The Involvement of Planners in Community Planning: A Promising Model for Chinese Local Governance? China Perspectives, 2019-3, 55–61. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/9491. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.9491 Lin, Z. Hooimeijer, P. Yanliu, G. and Geertman, S. 2020. Roles and Motivations of Planning Professionals Who Promote Public Participation in Urban Planning Practice: Two Case Studies from Beijing, China. Urban Affairs Review, 56(4), 1237–1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419895116 Lissandrello, E. Steffansen, R. and Nørgaard, L. S. 2023. Theorizing Public Participation in Urban Governance: Toward a New Normal Planning. In The ‘New Normal’ in Planning, Governance and Participation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32664-6_2 Makkonen, T. Vartiainen, N. Rauhut, D. and Rautiainen, S. 2024. Local government expenditure and quality of life in Finnish municipalities. Review of Regional Research, 44(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-024-00218-8 Mansouri Etemad, A. 2023. Assessment and Analysis of Urban Neighborhoods in Mashhad from the Perspective of the Calm City Approach (Case Study: Ahmadabad Neighborhood). Seventh International Congress on the Development of Engineering Infrastructure in Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning in Iran, Tehran, March 14-1. (In Persian) Marshall, S. Farndon, D. Hudson-Smith, A. and Karadimitriou, N. 2024. Urban Design and Planning Participation in the Digital Age: Lessons from an Experimental Online Platform. Smart Cities, 7(1), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7010025 Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China, 2020. 2017 Press Conference Records of Ministry of Environmental Protection, the People's Republic of China. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7330-5 Mokhtari Malekabadi, R. 2019. Analysis of Calm City Movement Indicators in the Fifteen Regions of Isfahan City. Spatial Planning, 9(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2018.111274.1225 (In Persian) Mulyani, W. P. Nadhifa, T. Srihadini, T. N. Nugroho, S. F. and Giyarsih, S. R. 2024. Participation in Decision Making and Use of Contraception (Modern or Traditional) and Unmet Need in Rural Urban of Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 13(2), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v13i2.80899 Municipality of District 5, 2009. Local Development Document for District 5, 2009, Bagh Feiz Neighborhood, n.d. https://region5.tehran.ir/ (In Persian) Naz, L. H. Zafar, J. M. and Ullah, N. 2024. Effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation system in improving educational facilities at secondary school level in Punjab (Pakistan). Journal of Academic Development Studies, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.3.15 Nursanty, E. Rusmiatmoko, D. and Husni, M. F. D. 2023. From heritage to identity: The role of city authenticity in shaping local community identity and cultural preservation. Journal of Architecture and Human Experience, 1(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.59810/archimane.v1i2.17 Othengrafen, F. Sievers, L. and Reinecke, E. 2023. Using augmented reality in urban planning processes: Sustainable urban transitions through innovative participation. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.S1.9 Özbek, D. A. and Erikçi, S. N. 2014. Slow City Movement is an Utopia of Livable City? In 2nd ICAUD International Conference in Architecture and Urban Design, 1–10. Epoka University, Tirana, Albania. https://www.academia.edu/8280192/Slow_City_Movement_is_An_Utopia_of_Livable_City Parameswara, A. Saskara, I. A. N. Utamani, M. S. and Setyari, P. W. 2021. The role of place identity, local genius, orange economy, and cultural policies for sustainability of intangible cultural heritage in Bali. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(8), 1551–1561. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160816 Raeisi, Shah Bakhsh, Miri, Gholamreza, Abkhesht, Safoura, Firoozi Rad, Sima, and Poryan, Afsaneh, 2022. Assessment and Analysis of Calm City Indicators in Iranian-Islamic Cities (Case Study: Chabahar City). Environmental Sciences and Geography Knowledge, 3(1). https://www.geo2.ir/article_201563.html?lang=en (In Persian) Reed, M. S. 2018. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 Shi, Y. Zhai, G. Zhou, S. and He, Z. 2019. Slow City development in China: process, approaches and acceptability. Third World Quarterly, 40(6), 1161-1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1594181 Smørdal, O. Wensaas, K. E. Lopez-Aparicio, S. Pettersen, I. N. and Hoelscher, K. 2016. Key issues for enhancing citizen participation in co-constructing city futures. Proc. of Fourth International Workshop on Cultures of Participation in the Digital Age, Gothenburg, Sweden. Souici, B. 2023. The landscape urban planning approach for improving urban air quality: Case study of Algiers. Journal of Mediterranean Cities, 3(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.38027/mediterranean Tahiri, D. 2022. A Slow City - Rethinking Ferizaj's infrastructures, landscape & urbanism. (Thesis for Sustainable Architecture & Landscape Design, advisor: Matteo Motti). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362532190_A_Slow_City_-_Rethinking_Ferizaj_'s_infrastructures_landscape_urbanism Vis, B. and Stolwijk, S. 2021. Conducting quantitative studies with the participation of political elites: Best practices for designing the study and soliciting the participation of political elites. Quality & Quantity, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01052-z Xu, H. Meng, M. Zhu, F. and Ding, Q. 2024. The role of local officials in promoting public participation during local urban planning processes: Evidence from Chinese cities. Land Use Policy, 141(2), 107108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107108 Xu, Z. Chang, J. Cheng, F. and Sun, J. 2024. Examining the impact of the built environment on multidimensional urban vitality: Using milk tea shops and coffee shops as new indicators of urban vitality. Buildings, 14(11), 3517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113517 yazdani, M. H., jami odulo, M. and Farzaneh sadat zaranj, Z. 2025. Investigating the role of cultural traditions on the sustainable development of cities with the approach of the peaceful city movement (Case study: Ardabil city). Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 8(2), 6366-6372. doi: 10.22034/jess.2022.357246.1855 (In Persian) Yoon, S. 2024. A new attempt at social innovation curriculum: The design and operation of ‘Urban Innovation Project (Capstone Design)’ by a private-public-academic partnership. The Korean Association of General Education, 18(1), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2024.18.1.347 Zadęcka, E. 2018. "Slow City" as a Local Development Model. Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 11(3), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2018-0027 Zbrueva, I. and Maltseva, A. 2024. Green spaces of public spaces of settlements of the Perm Territory. АгроЭкоИнфо, 6(66), 4. https://doi.org/10.51419/202146604 Zheng, J. and Zheng, X. 2022. Does Public Participation Matter to Planning? Urban Sculpture Reception in the Context of Elite-Led Planning in Shanghai. Sustainability, 14(12179), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912179 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 368 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 82 |
||