سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

شریعت نژاد, علی. (1402). شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در رشد و توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان بارویکرد سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی با روش نقشه شناخت فازی. , 22(56), 84-115. doi: 10.48308/jbmp.2024.233646.1565
علی شریعت نژاد. "شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در رشد و توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان بارویکرد سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی با روش نقشه شناخت فازی". , 22, 56, 1402, 84-115. doi: 10.48308/jbmp.2024.233646.1565
شریعت نژاد, علی. (1402). 'شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در رشد و توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان بارویکرد سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی با روش نقشه شناخت فازی', , 22(56), pp. 84-115. doi: 10.48308/jbmp.2024.233646.1565
شریعت نژاد, علی. شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در رشد و توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان بارویکرد سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی با روش نقشه شناخت فازی. , 1402; 22(56): 84-115. doi: 10.48308/jbmp.2024.233646.1565

شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در رشد و توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان بارویکرد سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی با روش نقشه شناخت فازی

چشم انداز مدیریت بازرگانی
دوره 22، شماره 56 - شماره پیاپی 90، اسفند 1402، صفحه 84-115    اصل مقاله (1.96 M)
نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jbmp.2024.233646.1565
نویسنده
علی شریعت نژاد*
استادیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در رشد و توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان بارویکرد سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی با روش FCM انجام پذیرفت. این پژوهش درزمره تحقیقات کاربردی است که با رویکرد توصیفی و اکتشافی انجام شده و از نظر داده های گردآوری شده دارای ماهیت آمیخته به صورت کیفی و کمی و از نظر فلسفه تحقیق دارای رویکرد قیاسی استقرایی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، خبرگان هستند که بر اساس اصل کفایت نظری 30 نفر از آنان با روش نمونه گیری گلوله برفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در بخش کمی پرسشنامه و در بخش کیفی مصاحبه است که روایی و پایایی آن ها به ترتیب با روش روایی محتوایی و بازآزمون برای پرسشنامه ها و روایی نظری و پایایی درون کدگذار میان کدگذار برای مصاحبه ها، تایید شد. روش تحلیل در بخش کیفی روش تحلیل محتوا و کدگذاری با نرم افزار Atlas.ti است و در بخش کمی پژوهش تحلیل داده ها با رویکرد FCM انجام شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می دهد که ارائه انواع برنامه‌های حمایتی موثر مانند معافیت کامل مالیاتی، تخصیص اعتبار مالیاتی و سیاست گرنت تحقیق و توسعه، افزایش سطح تسهیلات صندوق نوآوری و شکوفایی، حمایت گسترده مالی و عملی از طرح های بنیاد نخبگان و صندوق حمایت از فناوران و تشکیل کوریدور علمی و فناوری، مهمترین عوامل توسعه شرکت های دانش بنیان هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
رشد؛ توسعه؛ شرکت های دانش بنیان؛ سیاست گذاری و خط مشی گذاری مدیریتی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying the key factors of success in the growth and development of knowledge-based companies, the effectiveness of policymaking, and managerial policymaking with the Fuzzy Cognitive Map method
نویسندگان [English]
Ali Shariatnejad
Assistant professor,, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده [English]
The current research was carried out to identify the key factors of success in the growth and development of knowledge-based companies, using the FCM method. This research is in the category of applied research, which was conducted with a descriptive and exploratory approach, and in terms of the collected data, it has a mixed qualitative and quantitative nature, and in terms of the research philosophy, it has an inductive comparative approach.The statistical population of the research is the experts, and 30 of them were selected using the snowball sampling method based on the principle of theoretical adequacy.The data collection tool is in the quantitative part of the questionnaire and in the qualitative part of the interview, whose validity and reliability were confirmed by content validity and retest method for questionnaires and theoretical validity and intra-coder inter-coder reliability for interviews. The analysis method in the qualitative part is the method of content analysis and coding with Atlas.ti software, and in the quantitative part of the research, data analysis was done with the FCM approach. The results of the research show that the provision of various effective support programs such as full tax exemption, allocation of tax credit and research and development grant policy, increasing the level of facilities of the Innovation and Prosperity Fund, extensive financial and practical support for the projects of the Elite Foundation and the Technology Support Fund, and the formation of a scientific and technological corridor are the most important factors in the development of knowledge-based companies.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
growth, development, knowledge-based companies, policy and management policy
مراجع
  1. Adebayo, T. S., & Ullah, S. (2023). Formulating sustainable development policies for China within the framework of socioeconomic conditions and government stability. Environmental Pollution, 328, 121673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121673
  2. Aghaei, F., & Arbab Shirani, B. (2020). Investigating the impact of intellectual capital and its dimensions on technological innovation in knowledge-based companies with emphasis on the moderating role of environmental instability. 9th international conference on sustainable development techniques in management and industrial engineering with the approach of recognizing permanent challenges, Tehran. [In Persian]
  3. Bang, A., Molgaard Cleemann, C., & Bramming, P. (2020). “How to create business valuein the knowledge economy”. Accelerating thoughts of Peter F. Drucker. Management decision. 4(48). 616-627 .https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011041382
  4. Barclay, G. W. (2015). Colonial development and population in Taiwan.Breuer,
  5. , Leininger, J., Malerba, D., & Tosun, J. (2023). Integrated policymaking: Institutional designs for implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). World Development, 170, 106317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106317
  6. Davis, S. Becoming a, (2009), knowledgebase business, International Journal of Technology Management, 14(3), 60-73.
  7. Downer, A. (2010). Good Governance (Guiding principles for implementation), Australia, Canberra Mailing Centre.
  8. Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2021). Social networks` analysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 17535-17557. http:// 10.1007/s10668,02101399-9.
  9. Givarian, H., & Rabiei Mandjin, M. (2011). Advanced government policymaking process. Third edition. [In Persian]
  10. Godin, B. (2016). The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? The Journal of technology transfer. 31(1). 17-30. http:// 10.1007/s10961-005-5010-x.
  11. Hájek, P., Pachura, P., Procházka, O., & Stejskal, J. (2017). Textual Analysis for Developing Fuzzy Cognitive Maps-The Case of Strategy Maps. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(23).
  12. Hajipourfard, H., Soltani, B., Tolouei Eshlaghi, A., & Tabatabaeian, S. H. (2023). Investigating Factors Affecting the Development of Knowledge Base Businesses Based on IT. Business Intelligence Management Studies, 11(43), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.22054/IMS.2023.68619.2188. [In Persian]
  13. Hoshdar, F., Soltani, B., Fassihi, S., & Tashkori, N. (2019). Provide an improved model for classifying knowledge-based firms in Iran. Strategic Studies of public policy, 9(30), 215-233. [In Persian]
  14. Huang, L. S., & Lai, C. P. (2012). An investigation on critical success factors for knowledge management using structural equation modeling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 24-30.
  15. Izadian, Z., Abdollahi, B., & Kiani, M. (2012). Knowledge management is a model for managing knowledge-based firms in science and technology park. Roshd-E-Fanavari, 10(37), 64-75. http://roshdefanavari.ir/Article/139305131411161673 [In Persian]
  16. Jamshidnejad, G., Vahedi, M., Poursaied, A., & Chaharsooghi Amin, H. (2022). Factors affecting the development of Agricultural Knowledge-based Companies in the West of Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 53(3), 671-695. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.328763.669073. [In Persian]
  17. Joueidi, S. (2013). A taxonomy of manufacturing and service firms in Luxembourg according to technological skills. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49532
  18. Kaufmann, D. Leautier, F. & Massimo M. (2016), Globalization and Urban Performance. Cities in a Globalizing World Governance, Performance and Sustainability. The World Bank Washington DC.
  19. Kashef Ganjdaredar, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Fatemi, M. (2022). The knowledge of agricultural knowledge-based companies’ members regarding the principles of business continuity management (BCM) in Kerman province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 18(1), 87-105. http:// 20.1001.1.20081758.1401.18.1.6.9. [In Persian]
  20. Keshavarz, S., Yaghoubi, N., & Deghati, A. (2021). Evaluation of Success Factors of Knowledge-Based Companies of Fars’ Science and Technology Park Using Structural Equation Modeling. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 11(1), 35-50. http:// 20.1001.1.24767220.1400.11.1.10.8. [In Persian]
  21. Khajeh, F., & Shahbandarzadeh, H. (2019). Presentation of a Model based on Fuzzy Cognitive Map for Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Customer Satisfaction of the Container Terminal (Case Study: Bushehr Province Department of Ports and Mnitime organization). Journal of Executive Management, 10(19), 147-170. [In Persian]
  22. Khayatian Yazdi, M. S., Elyasi, M., & Tabatabaeeian, H. (2016). The Model for Sustainability of Knowledge-based Firms in Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 9(2), 49-62. https://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.20080840.1395.9.2.5.9 [In Persian]
  23. Kumar, A., Choudhary, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Rehman Khan, S. A., & Mishra, N. (2023). Analysis of critical success factors for implementing industry 4.0 integrated circular supply chain–Moving towards sustainable operations. Production planning & control, 34(10), 984-998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1980905
  24. Lin, J. H., Wang, M. Y., Lo, H. C. (2015). The complementary assets and appropriability affect patent
  25. commercialization on the moderate effect of marketing sensing capability: The case of bio-patents in Taiwan, Asia Pacific Management Review Journal, 4, 1-7.
  26. Naghizadeh, R., Hajari, M., & Rahman Khasmakhi, Z. (2019). The effective factors of Policy Pattern of Tax Support from Knowledge Based Activities. Journal of Technology Development Management, 7(2), 161-194. https://doi.org/ 10.22104/JTDM.2019.3432.2190 [In Persian]
  27. Nazari, F., Rahimipour Anaraki, A., Taghavi, S. S., & Ghasemi, B. (2021). The relationship among knowledge-based dynamic process capabilities, innovation processes and innovation performance: an empirical study of knowledge-based high-tech companies in Iran. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1379-1404.
  28. Niky Esfahlan, H., Hallaj, Yousefy, M., & Mortezapour, H. (2021). Identifying the obstacles of knowledge-based spinoff companies in Islamic Azad University. Journal of Industry and University, 13(47), 87-102. [In Persian]
  29. Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2014). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology. 30, 199-220 .
  30. Rashidi-kia, Y., Salman Vandi, J., & Hattaei, R. (2020). Knowledge-based organization. The 5th International Conference on New Perspectives in Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship, Tehran. [In Persian]
  31. Roumezi, H., Hosseinpour, M., Bahmei, L., & Nasiri, M. (2021). Identifying, Explaining and Ranking Indicators and Factors for the Creation and Development of knowledge-based Companies in the Humanities. Library and Information Sciences, 24(1), 50-77. http:// 10.30481/lis.2020.221942.1687 [In Persian]
  32. Salavati Sarcheshmeh, B., & Madah, M. (2008). Application of ARC model in reporting knowledge capitals of knowledge-based institutions. Technology Growth, 4(15), 41-47. https://sid.ir/paper/144952/fa. [In Persian]
  33. Samadi, M., Mirnezami, S. R., & Khargh, M. T. (2023). The impact of organizational capabilities on the international performance of knowledge-based firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100163
  34. Sarfarazi, B. E., yaghoubi, N., Mohammadi, M., & Jarrahi, J. (2022). Identifying the Effective Factors Contributing to Talent Management in Knowledge-Based Companies with a Focus on Knowledge Worker Retention. The Journal of Productivity Management, 16(1(60)) 77-107. [In Persian]
  35. Sevilla-Bernardo, J., Sanchez-Robles, B., & Herrador-Alcaide, T. C. (2022). Success factors of startups in research literature within the entrepreneurial ecosystem. administrative sciences, 12(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030102
  36. Shahmoradi, G. A., Torabi, T., Radfar, R., & Cheraghali, M. H. (2024). Designing a model for determining the level of technological complexity of research and development activities in knowledge-based companies. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications. http://10.22075/IJNAA.2023.30682.4466
  37. Shojaei, M. H., Shojaati, A., & Khaledi, A. (2021). Historical Analysis of the Formation and Development of Policy in the Law for Supporting Knowledge-based Firms. Journal of Improvement Management, 15(3), 63-90. https://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.22518991.1400.15.3.4.3 [In Persian]
  38. Taghvaei, A. A., & Tajdar, R. (2009). An introduction to good urban governance - analytical analysis. Urban Management, 7(23), 45-58. https://sid.ir/paper/92173/fa. [In Persian]
  39. Tsadiras, A., & Zitopoulos, G. (2017). Fuzzy cognitive maps as a decision support tool for container transport logistics. Evolving Systems, 8(1), 19-33.
  40. Vahdatpour, A., Bahrami, M., & Fadaei, M. (2020). Identifying factors affecting the company's success using the delta model (case study: knowledge-based companies). The first international industrial marketing management conference, Tehran. [In Persian]
  41. Wallace, H., Pollack, M. A., Roederer-Rynning, C., & Young, A. R. (Eds.). (2020). Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford University Press, USA
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 22,869
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,508