سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

بدیعی, میلاد, ابراهیمی سروعلیا, محمد حسن, سرگلزایی, مصطفی. (1402). اثر ساختار مالکیت بر عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد پانل پویا. , 13(42), 63-90. doi: 10.48308/jfmp.2023.103950
میلاد بدیعی; محمد حسن ابراهیمی سروعلیا; مصطفی سرگلزایی. "اثر ساختار مالکیت بر عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد پانل پویا". , 13, 42, 1402, 63-90. doi: 10.48308/jfmp.2023.103950
بدیعی, میلاد, ابراهیمی سروعلیا, محمد حسن, سرگلزایی, مصطفی. (1402). 'اثر ساختار مالکیت بر عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد پانل پویا', , 13(42), pp. 63-90. doi: 10.48308/jfmp.2023.103950
بدیعی, میلاد, ابراهیمی سروعلیا, محمد حسن, سرگلزایی, مصطفی. اثر ساختار مالکیت بر عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد پانل پویا. , 1402; 13(42): 63-90. doi: 10.48308/jfmp.2023.103950

اثر ساختار مالکیت بر عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد پانل پویا

چشم انداز مدیریت مالی
دوره 13، شماره 42، شهریور 1402، صفحه 63-90    اصل مقاله (645.93 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jfmp.2023.103950
نویسندگان
میلاد بدیعی* 1؛ محمد حسن ابراهیمی سروعلیا2؛ مصطفی سرگلزایی3
1کارشناسی ارشد مالی- مهندسی مالی و مدیریت ریسک، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران .
2دانشیار، گروه مالی و بانکداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
3استادیار، گروه مالی و بانکداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
شکل‌گیری نظام جدید حاکمیت شرکتی پس از سقوط انرون و ورلدکام در سال‌های ابتدایی قرن بیست و یکم در سطح جهانی و سرعت گرفتن روند واگذاری دارایی‌های دولت همگام با توسعه بازار سرمایه و تقویت سرمایه‌گذاری نهادی در سطح کشور، مسئله مالکیت و تاثیر آن بر عملکرد شرکت‌ها را به موضوعی مناقشه‌ برانگیز در حوزه ادبیات مالی بدل ساخته است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی رابطه میان ساختار مالکیت با عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می‌باشد. بر این اساس، پژوهش به بررسی اثر مالکیت نهادی و دولتی بر عملکرد مالی 146 شرکت پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی دوره 1400-1392 و با استفاده از روش پانل پویا پرداخته است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از اثر مثبت مالکیت نهادی بر عملکرد شرکت‌های نمونه می‌باشند. همچنین سنجه‌های عملکردی مبتنی بر اطلاعات حسابداری، رابطه معنادار و منفی مالکیت دولتی بر عملکرد شرکت را نشان می‌دهند. سایر یافته‌های پژوهش بیانگر اثر مثبت اهرم مالی و نگاه مثبت سهامداران نسبت به سهام شرکت‌های بزرگ و رشدی در ارزیابی عملکرد مالی شرکت می‌باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
روش پانل پویا؛ عملکرد شرکت؛ مالکیت دولتی؛ مالکیت نهادی
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Effect of Ownership Structure on the Corporate Financial Performance in Tehran Stock Exchange: a Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
نویسندگان [English]
Milad Badiei1؛ Mohammad Hasan Ebrahimi Sarve Oliya2؛ Mostafa Sargolzaei3
1M.Sc. in Financial Engineering and Risk Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2Associate Prof., Department of Finance and banking, University of Allame Tabataba’i, Tehran, Iran
3Assistant Prof, Department of Finance and banking, University of Allame Tabataba’i, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The developmentof a new system of corporate governance after the collapse of Enron and WorldCom in the early years of the 21st century at the global level and the acceleration of the process of handing over government assets simultaneously with the development of the capital market and the strengthening of institutional investment at the country level, the issue of ownership and its impact has made the performance of companies a controversial topic in the field of financial literacy. The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between the ownership structure and the financial performance of companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Based on this, the research investigated the effect of the relationship between institutional and government ownership on the financial performance of 146 listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange from 2012 to 2021 using the dynamic panel(Panel GMM) method. The research results indicate the positive effect of institutional ownership on the performance of sample companies. Also, performance metrics based on accounting information show a significant and negative relationship between government ownership and company performance. Other findings of the research show the positive effect of financial leverage and the positive view of shareholders towards the shares of large and growing companies in evaluating the company's financial performance
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Dynamic panel, Firm Performance, Government ownership, Institutional ownership
مراجع
  1. Abdallah, A.A.-N. and Ismail, A.K. (2017), “Corporate governance practices, ownership structure, and corporate performance in the GCC countries”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 46,98-115.
  2. Arabmazar Y., Mohammad; Alizadeh, Majid (2013). Ownership structure and the relationship between economic value added (EVA) and created shareholder value (CSV). Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 1(4).(in persian)
  3. Badavar.N, Younes, Zarei, Mostafa(2010), owner structure and performance of listed companies, Journal of Business Management, 2(7), 41-63.(in persian)
  4. Badiei, Milad.(2022), The effect of systematic risk sources on the performance of mutual funds in Tehran Stock Exchange, 2nd International Conference on Management Laboratory and Innovative Approaches in Management and Economics, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/1588995.(in persian)
  5. Baltagi, B.H., Demetriades, P.O. and Law, S.H. (2009), Financial development and openness: evidence from panel data, Journal of Development Economics,89 (2), 285-296.
  6. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M.M. and Zimmermann, H. (2006), An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation”, European Financial Management, 12(2), 249-283.
  7. Bekiris, F.V. (2013), Ownership structure and board structure: are corporate governance mechanisms interrelated?, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13 (4), 352-364.
  8. Borisova, G., Brockman, P., Salas, J.M. and Zagorchev, A. (2012), Government ownership and corporate governance: evidence from the EU, Journal of Banking Finance, 36 (11), 2917-2934.
  9. Boubakri, N., Chen, R.R., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O. and Nash, R. (2020), State ownership and stock liquidity: evidence from privatization, Journal of Corporate Finance,. 65, 101763.
  10. Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1996), A theory of privatisation, The Economic Journal,. 106 (435), 309-319.
  11. Carlin, W. and Mayer, C. (2002), International evidence on corporate governance: lessons for developing countries, Journal of African Economies, 11 (1), 37-59.
  12. Adjei Gyamfi Gyimah, Bismark Addai, George Kwasi Asamoah.(2021). Macroeconomic determinants of mutual funds performance in Ghana, Cogent Economics & Finance, 9:1
  13. Capobianco, A. and Christiansen, H. (2011), Competitive Neutrality and State-Owned Enterprises: Challenges and Policy Options, Working Papers, OECD Corporate Governance, 1.
  14. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J.P. and Lang, L.H. (2002), Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings, The Journal of Finance, 57 (6), 2741-2771.
  15. Colpan and Yoshikawa (2012), Performance sensitivity of executive pay: the role of foreign investors and affiliated directors in Japan, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20 (6), 547-561.
  16. Cornett, M.M., Marcus, A.J., Saunders, A. and Tehranian, H. (2007), The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance, Journal of Banking and Finance, 31 (6), 1771-1794.
  17. De Andres, P. and Vallelado, E. (2008), Corporate governance in banking: the role of the board of directors, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (12), 2570-2580.
  18. Delios, A. and Wu, Z.J. (2005), Legal person ownership, diversification strategy and firm profitability in China, Journal of Management and Governance, 9 (2), 151-169.
  19. Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985), The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences, Journal of Political Economy, 93 (6), 1155-1177.
  20. Demsetz, H. and Villalonga, B. (2001), Ownership structure and corporate performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (3), 209-233.
  21. Duggal, R. and Millar, J.A. (1999), Institutional ownership and firm performance: the case of bidder returns, Journal of Corporate Finance,. 5 (2), 103-117.
  22. Dwivedi, N. and Jain, A.K. (2005), Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: the effect of board size and ownership, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17 (3), 161-172.
  23. Agrawal, A. and Knoeber, C.R. (1996), Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 )3(, 377-397.
  24. Ellili, N.O.D. (2011), Ownership structure, financial policy and performance of the firm: US evidence, International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (10), 80.
  25. Elyasiani, E. and Jia, J. (2010), Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance, Journal of Banking and Finance,. 34 (3), 606-620.
  26. Elyasiani, E. and Jia, J.J. (2008), Institutional ownership stability and BHC performance, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (9), 1767-1781.
  27. Estrin, S., Meyer, K.E., Nielsen, B.B. and Nielsen, S. (2016), Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: a cross-country analysis, Journal of World Business, 51 (2), 294-307.
  28. Firth, M., Lin, C. and Wong, S.M. (2008), Leverage and investment under a state-owned bank lending environment: evidence from China, Journal of Corporate Finance, 14 (5), 642-653.
  29. Flannery, M.J. and Hankins, K.W. (2013), Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 19, 1-19.
  30. Hess, K., Gunasekarage, A. and Hovey, M. (2010), State-dominant and non-state-dominant ownership concentration and firm performance”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6 (4), 264-289.
  31. Hongxing, F. and Yu’na, J. (2013), Corporate governance, internal control and inefficient investment: theoretical analysis and empirical evidences [J], Accounting Research, 7, 1009.
  32. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305-360.
  33. Kang, H., Cheng, M. and Gray, S.J. (2007), Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2), 194-207.
  34. Aguilera, R., Duran, P., Heugens, P., Sauerwald, S., Roxana, T. and VanEssen, M. (2020), State ownership, political ideology, and firm performance around the world, Journal of World Business, 56 )1(, 101-113.
  35. Kang and Kim (2012), Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from the Chinese corporate reform, China Economic Review, 23 (2), 471-481.
  36. Kapopoulos, P. and Lazaretou, S. (2007), Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2), 144-158.
  37. Karpoff, J.M., Malatesta, P.H. and Walkling, R.A. (1996), Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: empirical evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 42 (3), 365-395.
  38. Kumar, J. (2004), Does ownership structure influence firm value? Evidence from India, The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance Business Ventures, 9 (2), 61-93.
  39. Lang, L.H. and So, R.W. (2002), Bank Ownership Structure and Economic Performance, Chinese University of Hong Kong mimeo, Hong Kong mimeo.
  40. Lazzarini, S.G. and Musacchio, A. (2018), “State ownership reinvented? Explaining performance differences between state-owned and private firms”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26 (4), 255-272.
  41. Lin, Y.R. and Fu, X.M. (2017), Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China, International Review of Economics Finance, 49, 17-57.
  42. Madiwe, J. (2014), Ownership Structure, Inside Ownership and Firm Performance, University of Twente, Enschede.
  43. Megginson, W.L., Nash, R.C. and Van Randenborgh, M. (1994), The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: an international empirical analysis, The Journal of Finance, 49 (2), 403-452.
  44. Moradi.J., saead; Fadaei Nejad, Mohammad Esmaeil; Ghorbani, Milad(2017). Company ownership structure and profit timeliness: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 7(17), 113-126.(in persian)
  45. Aharoni, Y. (1981), Performance evaluation of state owned enterprises: a process perspective,Management Science, Cambridge University Press, 27, 1340-1347.
  46. Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1988), “Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
  47. Nakano, M. and Nguyen, P. (2012), Board size and corporate risk taking: further evidence from Japan, Corporate Governance: An International Review,. 20 (4), 369-387
  48. Namazi, Mohammad; Kermani, Ehsan(2009). Investigating the Effects of Ownership Structure on The Performance of the Companies Accepted in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review, 15(4). (in persian)
  49. Nguyen, T., Locke, S. and Reddy, K. (2014), A dynamic estimation of governance structures and financial performance for Singaporean companies, Economic Modelling, 40, 1-11
  50. Ongore, V.O. (2011), Corporate governance and performance: an analysis of ownership structure in Kenya, International Journal of Governance, 1 (2), 404-423.
  51. Patterson, D.J. (2000), The Link Between Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance, New York: The Conference Board.
  52. Perrini, F., Rossi, G. and Rovetta, B. (2008), Does ownership structure affect performance? Evidence from the Italian market, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 312-325.
  53. Phung, D.N. and Hoang, T.P.T. (2013), Corporate ownership and firm performance in emerging market: a study of Vietnamese listed firms, Paper Presented at the World Business and Social
    Science Research Conference, October, Bangkok.
  54. Phung, D.N. and Mishra, A. (2016), Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Vietnamese listed firms, Australian Economic Papers, 55 (1), 63-98.
  55. Qi, D., Wu, W. and Zhang, H. (2000), “Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: evidence from listed Chinese companies”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8 (5), 587-610
  56. Alfaraih, M., Alanezi, F. and Almujamed, H. (2012), The influence of institutional and government ownership on firm performance: evidence from Kuwait, International Business Research,. 5(10),192.
  57. Rahmani, A., Mashaikh, S., & Popazam, M. (2011). Effect of ownership structure on corporate performance. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 3(9), 1-22.(in persian)
  58. Richard, P., Devinney, T., Yip, G., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management, 35. http://doi/10. 1177/0149206308330560. 
  59. Ross, S.A. (1977), The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach, Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (1), 23-40, Spring.
  60. Rowe, W. and Davidson, W.N. (2002), Endogeneity in Financial Performance and Board Composition: The Case of Closed-End Funds, Working Paper, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
  61. Severin, E. (2001), “Ownership structure and the performance of firms: evidence from France”, European Journal of Economic Social Systems, 15(2), 85-107.
  62. Shahab Udin; Muhammad Arshad Khan; Majid Jamal Khan; Muhammad Yar Khan(2021). Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: a dynamic panel data analysis, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10.1108/IJOEM-03-2019-0220.
  63. Shahveisi, F., Khairollahi, F. and Alipour, M. (2017), Does ownership structure matter for corporate intellectual capital performance? An empirical test in the Iranian context, Eurasian Business Review, 7 (1), 67-91
  64. Shakeri, A., & FATHI, Y. (2017). WTO Accessing Negotiations and Economic Growth: Dynamic Panel Data (Panel GMM) Approach. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 21(83), 135-182.(in persian)
  65. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997), A survey of corporate governance”, The Journal of Finance, 52 (2), 737-783.
  66. Smith, M.P. (1996), Shareholder activism by institutional investors: evidence from CalPERS, The Journal of Finance, 51 (1), 227-252.
  67. Al-Tamimi and Hassan, H.A. (2012), The effects of corporate governance on performance and financial distress, Journal of Financial Regulation Compliance, 169-181
  68. Stan, C.V., Peng, M.W. and Bruton, G.D. (2014), Slack and the performance of state-owned enterprises, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31 (2), 473-495.
  69. Sun, Q. and Tong, W.H. (2003), China share issue privatization: the extent of its success, Journal of Financial Economics, 70 (2), 183-222.

69 .Sun, Q., Tong, W.H. and Tong, J. (2002), How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29 (2), 1-27

  1. Tian, L. and Estrin, S. (2008), “Retained state shareholding in Chinese PLCs: does government ownership reduce corporate value?”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 36 (1), 74-89.
  2. Udin, S., Khan, M.A. and Javid, A.Y. (2017), The effects of ownership structure on likelihood of financial distress: an empirical evidence, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17 (4), 589-612
  3. Wintoki, M.B., Linck, J.S. and Netter, J.M. (2012), Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance, Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (3), 581-606.
  4. Xu, X. and Wang, Y. (1999), Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies, China Economic Review, 10 (1), 75-98.
  5. Yeh, C.M. (2019), Ownership structure and firm performance of listed tourism firms, InternationalJournal of Tourism Research, 21 (2), 165-179.
  6. Yu, M. (2013), State ownership and firm performance: empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies, China Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (2), 75-87.
  7. Zhuang, J. (1999), Corporate governance in East Asia and some policy implications, Economics and Development Resource Center, Asian Development Bank, available at: https://www.think-asia. org/bitstream/handle/11540/2617/bn014.pdf?sequence=1.
  8. Anderson, R.C. and Reeb, D.M. (2003), Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500, The Journal of Finance, 58 (3), 1301-1328.
  9. Antoniou, A., Guney, Y. and Paudyal, K. (2008), The determinants of capital structure: capital market-oriented versus bank-oriented institutions, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1). 59-92.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 16,233
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 11,783