سکسوئیشن و اختگی: بررسی روانشناختی امکانناپذیری روابط جنسی در رمان شکننده لیزا آنگر | ||
| نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی | ||
| دوره 20، شماره 30، تیر 1402، صفحه 135-160 اصل مقاله (472.86 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/clls.2023.103680 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی خوش کلام پور1؛ بختیار سجادی* 2؛ فریبا پرویزی3 | ||
| 1گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی و زبانشناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران. | ||
| 3گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه ارشاد دماوند، دماوند، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این مقاله با بهرهگیری از نظریه سکسوئیشن که لاکان آن را مطرح نمود و همچنین مباحث روانشناختی و اجتماعی آلن بدیو و اسلاوی ژیژک در مورد روابط جنسی سوژه معاصر، سعی دارد نشان دهد رمان شکننده (2010) اثر لیزا آنگر تحت تاثیر روابط اجتماعی مختص به دوران پسا-سرمایه داری عاری از پدرادیپی اقتدارگرا است. در رمان مذکور فقدان هرگونه رابطه جنسی واقعی روابط فردی و اجتماعی ساکنین شهر هالوز را تحت تاثیر قرار میدهد و تمام تلاش هایی را که شخصیت های داستان در جهت کامجویی مطلق در روابط جنسی انجام می دهند با ناکامی مواجه می کند. هبوط نقش پدری به آزادی هرچه بیشتر روابط میان مادر و پسر انجامیده است و دراین میان پدرتضعیف شده دوران کنونی تنها می تواند نظاره گر از میان رفتن نقش نمادین خود باشد. رمان شکننده روایتگر رقابت میان مردان و زنان بر سر ژویسانس مرتبط با روابط جنسی است و آنها بر این باورند که جنس مخالف سارق ژویسانس آنهاست. بنابراین، شخصیتهای آنگر به طیف گستردهای از رفتارهای ناهنجار روی میآورند تا بتوانند از این لذت برخوردار شوند. از این رو دچار شدن به مشکلات روحی و جنسی ازجمله انحراف اخلاقی، روانپریشی، و اختلال روانی کمترین هزینه ای است که در این راه می پردازند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سکسوئیشن؛ اختگی؛ ژویسانس؛ روانپریشی؛ پسا-سرمایه داری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Sexuation and Phallic Castration: A Psychoanalytic Study of the Impossibility of Sexual Relationship in Lisa Unger’s Fragile | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehdi Khoshkalam Pour1؛ Bakhtiar Sadjadi2؛ Fariba Parvizi3 | ||
| 1Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language and Literature and Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| 3Department of English, Ershad-Damavand University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: The present paper proposes that Lisa Unger’s Fragile (2010) is involved in a late capitalist social phenomenon that announces both the extinction of the authoritative Oedipal Father and the liberation of mOther and son from his reign. The Hollowers in the novel are incapable of experiencing any real sexual relationship the lack of which heavily influences their personal and social life. The present paper reveals that even the Hollowers’ commitment of rape, incest, and even murder cannot compensate for the enjoyment of the proper sexual relationship they are innately deprived of. In Fragile, both man and woman infer an ancient rivalry over jouissance from their sexual relationship. Accordingly, Unger’s characters orchestrate various psychological schemes for optimum pleasure from their sexual relationship, while they become involved with some irreparable psychological disorders that neither supply them with their desired pleasure from sex, nor release them from the sexual traumas that permanently remain with them. Background of Study: Between Žižek and Badiou, there is no contention that the contemporary man cannot live up to the name and authority associated with the Oedipal Father, and epitomize the Big Phallus of the Symbolic Order. However, while Žižek reduces woman to an object of exchange between father and son (Žižek, Enjoy Symptoms! 75), Badiou does not consider her as a passive object-cause-of-desire; quite contrary, to Badiou, woman can freely serve and express her social and sexual identity and challenge man’s long-held symbolic superiority (Badiou, True Life 82). The sexuation theory extensively covers the sexual relationship between man and woman and discusses that proper and meaningful sexual relationship is impossible due to the fact both man and woman view it as a place to demand their jouissance. Methodology: Sexual relationship in proper sense, as the sexuation theory implies, is impossible, for man uses it to dominate woman whereas he is basically under delusions of authority (Žižek, Enjoy Symptoms! 156). The sexuation theory publicizes the decline of the Oedipal Father and the late-capitalist phenomenon of orphan bodies that the anal father of jouissance adopts in order to promote frenzied consumerism and monopolized jouissance (Felicia Cosey 6). However, the Oedipal Father’s collapse is followed by the subject’s metamorphosis into the ‘sacrificed body’ that is perplexed with inexplicable che vuoi questions regarding his symbolic value. The Oedipal Father now morbidly envies his son’s firm ties with his wife through what Badiou coins as ‘infantilization’ (Tutt 10). Žižek’s underrating insight to woman as merely “one of the Names of the Father” (Žižek, Enjoy Symptoms 169) is weighed against Badiou’s view of woman as a free agent of herself. This paper finds pertinent the sexuation theory with the psychological disorders of ‘neurosis’, ‘psychosis’, and ‘perversion’, and illustrates the subject’s crushing oscillation between the pleasure of sexual intimacy and the preservation of consciousness and symbolic integrity. Conclusion: The sexual relationship in Lisa Unger’s Fragile is a devastating experience rather than a pleasurable one; indeed, the more they try to enjoy their sexual relationship, the more dismayed they become. Fragile, in line with Žižek’s psychoanalytic hypotheses, demonstrated that authentic sexual relationship is profoundly influenced by the subject’s process of phallic castration that permanently takes him away from the Imaginary Order and the Real encompassed in; therefore, both man and woman presume the sexual relationship as a way to retrieve the lost Real. This article illustrated that in the post-capitalism era, the restrictive Freudian Oedipal Father cannot survive and exert his influence on his household; instead, as the novel of Fragile indicates, the contemporary father is eclipsed by his wife and son’s strong emotional ties that have shaped after he lost his symbolic authority. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Sexuation, Castration, Jouissance, Neurosis, Post-Capitalism | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Areheart, Shaye. Rev. of Fragile, by Lisa Unger. Kirkus Reviews, 3 June 2010. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/lisa-unger/fragile/ Badiou, Alain. “The Son’s Aleatory Identity in Today’s World. New York.” Lacanian Ink, vol. 32, 2007. https://www.lacan.com/lacinkXXXII1.html PDF download. _____. True Life. Translated by Susan Spitzer. Polity, 2017. _____. The Pornographic Age. Translated by A. J. Bartlett and Justin Clemens. Bloomsbury. 2017. _____. There’s No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lessons on Lacan. Translated by Susan Spitzer and Kenneth Reinhard. Colombia UP, 2017. Bracher, Mark, editor. Lacanian Theory of Discourse Subject, Structure, and Society. New York UP, 1994. Butler, Rex, editor. The Žižek Dictionary. Routledge, 2014. Cosey, Felicia. “What Wall-E Can Teach Us About Global Capitalism in the Age of Anal Father.” International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, 2018, https://Žižekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/1018. PDF download. Feldstein, Richard, editor. Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud. New York UP, 1996. Fink, Bruce. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Practice. Harvard UP, 1997. _____. Lacan on Love: An Exploration of Lacan’s Seminar VIII,. Polity, 2016. _____. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton UP, 1995. Unger, Lisa. Rev. of Under My Skin by Lisa Unger. Bouchercon Author Interview, 27 Sept. 2018 http://crimebythebook.com Gildersleeve, Matthew. “Method in the Madness: Hysteria and the Will to Power.” Social Sciences vol. 5, no. 29, 2016, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/5/3/29 . PDF download. Jason, Philip K. “When delicate bonds are stretched to the limit.” Rev. of Fragile, by Lisa Unger. Florida Weekly, 23 Sept. 2010, https://naples.floridaweekly.com/articles/ https://naples.floridaweekly.com/articles/when-delicate-bonds-are-stretched-to-the-limit/ Johnston, Adrian. Time Driven: Metapsychology and the Splitting of the Drive. Northwestern UP, 2005. Johnston, Adrian. Žižek's Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity. Northwestern UP, 2008. Khaleseh Dehghan, Mohsen and Bakhtiar Sadjadi. “The Mirror of Consumption and Media in American Postmodern Fiction: A Baudrillardian Reading of Bret Easton Ellis’ American Psych.” Critical Language and Literary Studies, vol. 14, no.19, Nov. 2018, pp. 120-140. [In Persian] https://clls.sbu.ac.ir/article_99996.html. PDF download. Khodambashi Emami, Kaveh and Hossein Pirnajmuddi. “Social Engagement in Fiction in the Age of Semio-capitalism: The Case of David Foster Wallace.” Critical Language and Literary Studies, vol. 19, no. 28, Aug. 2022, pp. 78-101 [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.52547/clls.19.28.77. PDF download. Lease, Bryce. “How Badly Do You Want to Kill Your Father?” International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008, https://Žižekstudiesorg.translate.goog/index.php/ijzs/article/view/78/137 PDF download. Michelsen, Magnus. Tarrying with Sexual Matters: Thinking Change from Lacan to Badiou. PhD dissertation, U of Bergen, 2018. Strachey, James, editor. Sigmund Freud: The Interpretation of Dreams. Basic Books, 2010. Salecl, Renata, ed. Sexuation. Duke UP, 2000. Soler, Colette. What Lacan Said about Women: A Psychoanalytic Study. Other, 2003. Tutt, Daniel. “Oedipus and the Social Bond in Žižek and Badiou.” International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, 2014, https://Žižekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/790. PDF download. Unger, Lisa. Fragile. New York, Shaye Archeart, 2010. PDF File Unger, Lisa. Rev. of Under My Skin by Lisa Unger. Bouchercon Author Interview, 27 Sept. 2018 http://crimebythebook.com
Žižek, Slavoj and Renata Salecl. Gaze and Voice as Love Objects. Duke UP, 1996 _____, and Boris Gunjevic. God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse. Seven Stories, 2012. Žižek, Slavoj . (2016). Is God Dead, Unconscious, Evil, Impotent, Stupid … Or Just Counterfactual? International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, https://zizekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/97/96
_____. Less than Nothing: Hegel and Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. Verso, 2012. _____. Sex and the Failed Absolute. Bloomsbury, 2020. _____. “Sex, Love and Coronavirus.” International Journal of Žižek Studies , vol. 14, no. 2, 2020, http://Žižekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/1176/1202" . PDF Download
_____. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel and the Critique of Ideology. Duke UP, 1993. _____. The Indivisible Remainder. Verso, 2007. _____, Ericl Santner, and Kenneth Reinhard. The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology. Chicago UP, 2006. _____. The Plague of Fantasy. Verso, 1997. _____. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso, 1989. ____ . The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. Verso, 1999. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 30,002 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 145,743 |
||