تأثیر تعاملی نهاد ریسک و پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی در کشورهای منتخب اسلامی | ||
| اقتصاد و الگو سازی | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 45، خرداد 1400، صفحه 141-171 اصل مقاله (779.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48308/jem.2021.221089.1590 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابوالفضل شاه آبادی* 1؛ سوگند بات2؛ علی مرادی3 | ||
| 1استاد گروه اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2کارشناس‌ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی گروه مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بوئین زهرا، بوئین زهرا، ایران | ||
| 3کارشناس‌ارشد اقتصاد گروه اقتصاد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اراک، اراک، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| رشد سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی با پوشش شکاف پس‌انداز- سرمایه‌گذاری، انتقال فناوری، انتقال دانش فنی و بهره‌گیری از مهارت‌ها و شیوه‌های نوین مدیریتی می‌تواند به تحریک رشد و توسعه اقتصادی در کشورهای درحال توسعه بیانجامد. در این راستا، تحقیق حاضر سعی دارد تأثیر تعاملی نهاد ریسک و پیچیدگی اقتصادی را بر جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی در کشورهای منتخب درحال توسعۀ عضو سازمان همکاری اسلامی طی دوره 2018-2003 بررسی نماید. به همین منظور الگوی تحقیق با استفاده از داده‌های تابلویی و به روش گشتاورهای تعمیم‌یافته در دو حالت برآورد گردید. در حالت اول، تأثیر انفرادی شاخص‌های ریسک سیاسی، ریسک اقتصادی، ریسک مالی (جایگزین نهاد ریسک) و پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی بررسی شد. در حالت دوم، تأثیر تعاملی ریسک‌های سیاسی، اقتصادی و مالی با پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم بررسی گردید. نتایج نشان داد، تأثیر انفرادی ریسک‌های سیاسی، اقتصادی و مالی بر جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی منفی و معنادار و تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر آن مثبت و معنادار است. اما، تأثیر تعاملی ریسک‌های سه‌گانه و پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی منفی و معنادار است. به این معنا که افزایش ریسک‌های سه‌گانه از مجرای کاهش پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی تأثیر منفی و معناداری گذاشته است. این یافته درس‌های مهمی برای کشورهای منتخب از جمله ایران دارد که با کاهش ریسک کشوری و به تبع آن افزایش پیچیدگی اقتصادی، می‌توان جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی را شدت بخشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی؛ نهاد ریسک؛ پیچیدگی اقتصادی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Interactive Effect of Risk Institution and Economic Complexity on Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in Selected Islamic Countries | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abolfazl Shahabadi1؛ Sogand Bat2؛ Ali Moradi3 | ||
| 1Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2MA in Business Administration, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University (Buinzahra Branch), Buinzahra, Iran | ||
| 3MA in Economics, Islamic Azad University (Arak Branch), Arak, Iran, | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The growth of foreign direct investment through covering the gap between saving-investment, the transfer of advanced technologies, the transfer of technical knowledge, and the transfer of managerial skills and new production methods can increase the economic growth in developing countries. In this regard, the present study attempts to investigate the interactive effect of the risk and economic complexity on foreign direct investment attraction in selected countries of the organization of Islamic cooperation (OIC) from 2003 to 2018. For this purpose, the research model was estimated using panel data and the GMM in two modes. In the first case, the individual effects of the indicators of political risk, economic risk, financial risk (as a proxy index of institution), and economic complexity on attracting foreign direct investment were investigated. In other case, the interactive effect of political, economic, and financial risk with economic complexity on foreign direct investment was investigated. The results show that the individual effect of political, economic and financial risks on foreign direct investment is negative, and the effect of economic complexity is positive. However, the interactive effect of triple risks and economic complexity on attracting foreign direct investment is negative and significant. In other words, the increase in triple risks through the reduction of economic complexity has a negative effect on attracting foreign direct investment. This finding has important lessons for selected countries, including Iran, that reducing national risk and, consequently, increasing economic complexity, can increase the attraction of foreign direct investment. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Foreign Direct Investments, Risk Institution, Economic Complexity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Agarwal, J. (1980). Determinants of foreign direct investment: A survey. Review of world economics, 116(4), 739-773. - Akbarian, R. & Dianati, M. H. (1385). Risk management in interest-free banking. Islamic Economics, 6(24), 153-170 (In Persian). - Ansari Samani, H., Mahmudi, Z. Namdari, S. (2017). The relationship between risk and foreign direct investment in selected developing countries (Dynamic panel data approach). The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 3(2), 71-104 (In Persian). - Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 97, 58-277. - Aziz, A. & Makkawi, B. (2012). Relationship between foreign direct investment and country population. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(8), 63-70. - Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 3rd Edition, New York, USA. - Bouyahiaoui, N. & Hammache, S. (2017). The impact of country risk on foreign direct investments in the MENA region. Economics, Commerce and Trade Management: An International Journal (ECTIJ), 1(1), 1-14. - Davoodi, P. & Shahmoradi, A. (2004). Reinvestigation of the FDI determinants using panel data model. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 6(20), 81-113 (In Persian). - Dogan, C. & Arslan, U. (2016). Political globalization and foreign direct investment inflows in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 6(5), 43-48. - Dunning, J. H. (1981). International production and the multinational enterprise. London; Boston: Allen & Unwin. - Elahi, N., Heydari, H., Kiaalhoseini, S. Z. & Abolhasani Chimeh, M. A. (2018). The effect of trade openness and government size on macroeconomic volatility in Iran: A stochastic volatility model (SVM) approach. Journal of Econometric Modeling, 3(3), 11-37 (In Persian). - Fathi, S. & Kabiripour, V. (2012). Investigating the various dimensions of political risk and its impact on foreign direct investment. Business Reviews, 52, 20-33 (In Persian). - Hayakawa, K., Kimura, F. & Lee, H. H. (2013). How does country risk matter for foreign direct investments? The Developing Economies, 51(1), 60–78. - Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309-342. - Hausmann, R., Hwang, J. & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1): 1–25. - Hidalgo, C. A. & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. - Ho, L.T. & Gan, C. (2021). Foreign direct investment and world pandemic uncertainty index: Do health pandemics matter? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(107), 1-15 (In Persian). - Jalali, O. Ansari Samani, H. & Hatefi Madjumerd, M. (2017). The effect of political risk on foreign direct investment in Iran. Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 8(29), 157-174 (In Persian). - Khan, H., Khan, U. & Khan, M. A. (2020). Causal nexus between economic complexity and FDI: Empirical evidence from time series analysis. Chinese Economy, 53(5), 374-394 (In Persian). - Kiplagat, B. (2016). The effects of interest rates on foreign direct investments in Kenya. A research project submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Business Administration (MBA), School of Business, and University of Nairobi. - Komijani, A. & Ghavidel, S. (2006). The spillover effect of FDI on employment of skilled and unskilled service sector. Economic Research, 41(5), 29-50 (In Persian). - Meyer, D. F. & Habanabakize, T. (2018). An analysis of the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI), political risk and economic growth in South Africa. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(4), 777-788. - Mohammadzadeh, Y., Jahangiri, K., Refah-kahriz, A. & Valizadeh, E. (2018). The effect of property rights and political risk to attract foreign direct investment using with PVAR approach. Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 7(26), 115-144 (In Persian). - Ostadi, H., Rifat, B. & Raisi, A. A. (2013). The role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Iran's economic growth (1978-2008) and the study of their interrelationship. Economic Development Research, 3(9), 147-172 (In Persian). - Peres, M., Ameer, W. & Xu, H. (2018). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: evidence for developed and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 626-644. - Pernet, T. (2014). Economic complexity and location of foreign firms in China. https://dumas.ccsd. cnrs.fr/dumas-01108613/document. - Petrovic-Randelovic, M., Jankovic-Milic, V. & Kostadinovic, I. (2017). Market size as a determinant of the foreign direct investment inflows in the Western Balkans Countries. Economics and Organization, 14(2), 93-104. - Pugliese, E., Chiarotti, G. L., Zaccaria, A., & Pietronero, L. (2014). The discernment of heterogeneous country industrialization patterns through economic complexity. https://linkp.ir/9Pgx. - Rafat, M. & Farahani, M. (2019). The country risks and foreign direct investment (FDI). The Iranian Economic Review (IER), 23(1), 235-260. - Ra’i, R. & Fazelian, S. M. (2013). Attract foreign investment in developing countries (with emphasis on the Islamic Republic of Iran). Strategic Management Thought, 6(2), 63-97 (In Persian). - Sedik, W. M. (2012). The impact of country risk and new institutional economics on foreign direct investment: A panel data analysis for Middle East and North Africa region. The 16th Meeting of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, University of Southern California on June, 2102. - Shaghaghi Shahri, V. (2017). Regional integration, knowledge-based economy and its impact on foreign direct investment (Case study: Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) member countries). Journal of Economy and Regional Development, 24(14), 24-54 (In Persian). - Shahmoradi, B. & Chiniforoshan, P. (2017). Measuring the knowledge and skill using economic complexity approach. Rahyaft Journal, 67, 47-62 (In Persian). - Stojkoski, V., Utkovski, Z. & Kocarev, L. (2016). The impact of services on economic complexity: Service sophistication as route for economic growth. Public Library of Science (PLOS) ONE, 11(8), 1-29. - Teseng, W. & Zebreg, H. (2002). Foreign direct investment in China: Some lessons for other countries. IMF Policy Discussion Paper, (PDP/02/3). - UNCTAD. (1998). World investment report. NewYork and Geneva, United Nation, 91-116. - Wijeweera, A., Villano, R. & Dollery B. (2010). Economic growth and FDI inflows: A stochastic frontier analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 43(2), 143-158. - Zakari, M. (2017). The impact of exchange rate fluctuations on foreign direct investment in Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(4), 165-170. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 449 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 424 |
||